Responding to the Critics

The Distorted Hermeneutic of Modern Futurism – #4

We are examining the flawed hermeneutic of the futurist apologists. When debating with one another, they both utilize this flawed hermeneutic, and then condemn it, when it is used by their opponents! Inconsistent? To say the very least! The Dominionists condemn the Dispensationalists for arguing that since the word “church” is missing in Revelation 4-22 that the subject is not…

Continue Reading

Responding to the Critics

The Distorted Hermeneutic of Modern Futurism – #2

In our first article on this issue, I shared how Amillennialists, Postmillennialists and Dispensationalists all resort to what is commonly called an argument from silence. To illustrate, the Dispensationalists claims that because the word “church” is not found in Revelation 4-22 that the subject cannot be there. In response, Dominionists such as Kenneth Gentry, Gary DeMar and others (seemingly) reject…

Continue Reading

Responding to the Critics

The Distorted Hermeneutic of Modern Futurism- #1

While futurist eschatology dominates the landscape today, when one looks closer at their hermeneutic, one quickly discovers that there is something fundamentally and fatally flawed present. The interpretive system incorporated by all of the futurist views, is so self-contradictory, illogical, and unreasonable, once examined, that there really is no ground for accepting their conclusions.

Responding to the Critics

A Charge of Misrepresentation Refuted #1

Don K. Preston D. Div.In numerous formal debates and in many written debates I have provided the audience with quotes and direct references from my opponents in regard to their self-contradictions. As a result, on many occasions, when confronted with the indisputable fact of their own self contradictions, and worse, of how their own words contradict scripture, my opponents have…

Continue Reading